uwilogo.gif (2958 bytes) Lightrays.gif (11052 bytes) tliulogo.gif (3454 bytes)
TLIU: Promoting Tertiary Education Development and Institutional Co-operation in the Region.
TopMenuBar.gif (2113 bytes)

 

PetersHeader.gif (4436 bytes)
The last issue of “Lightrays” (June 2000) addressed matters related to the promotion of quality assurance as an indispensable factor in the future development of the tertiary education sector in the Commonwealth Caribbean.

This current issue takes a look at the importance of forging inter-institutional linkages among the tertiary level institutions in the region and will in particular identify the types of formal linkages that tertiary education providers will need to forge so as to achieve improved rationalization, deeper integration of the regional system of tertiary education and increased opportunities for collaboration.

In consideration of these matters, it is of course important to understand the theoretical underpinnings on which such experiences, particularly those considered best practices should be grounded.  The nature and impact of institutional development in tertiary education is to a large extent based on the supportive environment provided by a variety of inter-institutional linkages.

The literature on Institutional Development identifies three types of inter-institutional linkages which tertiary institutions generally find worthy of pursuing.  These are: (1) enabling linkages; (2) normative linkages and (3) functional linkages.  Each of these deals conceptually with a particular aspect of the operations of individual institutions.  When combined they constitute the elemental requirements of institutional development.  The enabling linkages are generally associated with matters related to the policies, the authoritative basis and the governance of the institution.  They also relate to mandates and resource allocations made available to the institutions for their effective functioning and viability.  Those linkages that are intended to address matters of institutional quality assurance including the setting of standards and establishing norms to improve, among other things, student learning, teaching-learning processes and overall institutional effectiveness are generally regarded as normative linkages.  The third type of institutional linkages – the functional linkages – refers to inter-institutional relationships that treat as a central objective the collaboration and pursuit of strategic partnerships among the institutions concerned.

Enabling Linkages

In order to strengthen enabling linkages that are supportive of collaborative relationships this would normally require that the tertiary institutions, particularly those that are publicly supported to continue to aggressively forge linkages with those governmental entities (Ministries of Education, Finance, Planning, Labour, etc.) that provide the legal authority, financial and other governmental supports for their current operations and long-term viability.  The effects of such linkages should be a demonstration of responsiveness and accountability on the part of the institutions concerned.  Beyond that, there is also the need for these institutions to engage themselves in exploring new and innovative ways with the private sector with a view to strengthening existing enabling linkages and creating new avenues.  For example the publicly supported colleges might consider actively soliciting the participation of representatives of the private sector in college governance, in programme development, in apprenticeship and internship schemes and similar types of activities.  One of the obvious benefits of this type of stakeholder linkage is that the institutions concerned could well find themselves in a better position to avail themselves of other enabling supports beyond what government would normally make available to them.

Normative Linkages

The second type of linkage is generally intended to promote inter-institutional relationships of a normative nature especially in the context of institutional pluralism.  To illustrate, the tertiary level institutions in the region are a diverse group; their governance structures and management systems vary, there is variability in the programmes, the modes of delivery, the teaching-learning processes and indeed the students who attend these institutions.  Diversity is a pervasive feature of the region’s tertiary sector and is considered to be a strength.  Tertiary education in this region needs also to be recognized nationally, regionally and internationally for its high standards of quality in respect of staff, students, the curriculum, the awards granted as well as the institutional context within which teaching and learning take place.  In order to achieve recognition of high quality and standards of excellence, the institutions will need to increase their efforts at forging links with national accreditation bodies (such as University Council of Jamaica and Committee for the Recognition of Degrees in Trinidad and Tobago); the professional bodies such as the regional Nursing Council, and such other regional accreditation entities including the Association of Caribbean Tertiary Institutions (ACTI) which is now considered the premier regional accreditation body.  Quality assurance processes (accreditation, institutional self-assessments, external moderation, programme articulation and validation of awards) are among the quality related outcomes which such normative linkages are intended to produce to the benefit of the institution and its students and staff. 

Continued on next page...

 

thankyou.gif (2326 bytes)
OnlineMasters.gif (5731 bytes)
PreviousIssues.gif (3178 bytes)